| ID | Updated | Subject | Reason | Mandate | Effective Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | November, 2008 | Qualification by Similarity Policy Statement | Update to the USB-IF Qualification by Similarity Program | Required | August, 2008 |
|
|
|||||
| 14 | October, 2007 | Model number feature identification conventions | Model numbers placed on Integrators List must clearly identify the certified product | Required | Now |
|
|
|||||
| 29 | July, 2007 | USB-IF Certified USB Logo Trademark Violations | How to contact the USB-IF regarding certified, non-compliant USB products | Informational | n/a |
|
|
|||||
| 13 | June, 2007 | "No Silent Failure" policy | Clarification of the "No Silent Failure" rule | Required | April, 2005 |
|
|
|||||
| 18 | June, 2007 | ExpressCard | No USB certification available for Express Card | Informational | |
|
|
|||||
| 16 | April, 2007 | Vendor ID Usage | Vendor IDs belong to the company to which it is assigned | Required | February, 2007 |
|
|
|||||
| 15 | April, 2007 | Use of certified On-The-Go (OTG) building blocks in non-OTG products | Policy statement on OTG building blocks | Optional | |
|
|
|||||
| 17 | March, 2007 | Waivers | Policy Statement | Informational | |
|
|
|||||
| "No Silent Failure" policy Mandate: Required Effective Date: April, 2005 The success of USB has been achieved by ensuring a consistent, reliable and enjoyable consumer experience. Translated, this means USB devices "just work." Consumers have come to expect a USB device to become quickly available and usable when attached to the bus. Now, with USB expanding into an ever widening array of applications and industries, it is important to continue to meet the consumer's expectations regarding USB in these new applications. The USB-IF enforces a "no silent failure" rule. This means that an implementation of USB must not appear broken to the consumer. In configurations where the consumer's expectations are not met, either the peripheral or host must provide appropriate and useful feedback to the consumer regarding the problem. Example 1: Example 2: Different messages for hubs and non-hubs are required. If the attached peripheral is a hub, the embedded host must be able to display a message indicating that the attached hub is not supported. Care should be taken to distinguish between standalone hubs and compound peripherals. If an unsupported hub is attached, the embedded host should read bit D2 the wHubCharacteristics field of the hub descriptor and display the appropriate message in case the attached hub is part of a compound peripheral. |
| Model number feature identification conventions Mandate: Required Effective Date: Now The USB-IF Integrators List consists of Certified USB products. Only products that have passed required compliance tests are listed. The model number displayed on the Integrators List must clearly represent the certified product.
Some vendors insert variable place holders (typically with an 'X') in the model number to denote different features of a product. For example, a product that comes in two colors, black and white, may have model numbers 123B and 123W. Since the feature is cosmetic, the USB-IF allows the use of a variable in the color field, such as 123X, on the Integrators List. The USB-IF does not permit variables to represent features that can affect USB compliance. For example, if a vendor has a full-speed and a high-speed version of a product, the model number placed on the Integrators List cannot use a variable in the model number to represent the speed of the product. The naming convention for devices, silicon, cables, connectors, etc. must be clear and identify only certified product. USB connectors and USB cable assemblies are prohibited from using wildcards in their model names. |
| Use of certified On-The-Go (OTG) building blocks in non-OTG products Mandate: Optional Effective Date: Embedded hosts and standard peripherals may use certified On-The-Go building blocks provided OTG specific features are not exposed.
If a standard USB peripheral does not support SRP, then the OTG Descriptor must not be included with the GetDescriptor(configuration) data set. HNP is reserved for USB On-The-Go devices and is not permitted in embedded USB hosts and standard USB peripherals. HNP is the identifying function of OTG. An embedded host should not attempt to enable an OTG peripheral for HNP. This could cause unexpected behavior of the OTG peripheral. Execution of the OPT test TD.4.5 "A-UUT is Reset//Enumerated as Peripheral After HNP" is required to determine if the non-OTG embedded host attempts to use any OTG functions. The Micro-USB AB-receptacle is reserved for USB On-The-Go devices only and is not permitted in devices that do not support HNP. The Micro-USB AB-receptacle is the identifying feature of OTG. |
| Vendor ID Usage Mandate: Required Effective Date: February, 2007 The Vendor ID used by a product must match the VID of the company producing the product (the integrator). Please ensure that the VID used by the product matches the company making the product. The USB-IF does not permit the product to display the silicon VID instead of the company making the product.
If the VID of a product does not match the VID of the integrator, the USB-IF will not permit the device to be added to the Integrators List. If the integrator has permission to use the VID of the other company, then written permission from the other company must be included with the checklist submission to the USB-IF. With written permission, the device may be listed on the Integrators List. |
| Waivers Mandate: Informational Effective Date: Vendors are expected to design to the USB specification and only devices that comply with the USB specification are able to use the logo. The USB-IF recognizes, however, that some violations are minor and have, effectively, no negative affect on the performance of the product. The USB-IF may grant a waiver to a device that violates the USB specification or fails a certification test. Although rarely granted, the waiver forgives the violation and permits the device to use the official logo.
Waivers are only granted at USB-IF sponsored workshops or when submitted via a USB-IF authorized test facility. We need to verify and assess the nature of the problem first-hand and with independent test data. The USB-IF may discuss the possibility of a waiver with a vendor without independent test data, but opinions stated are not binding and are subject to change based on official data collected at the time of testing.
The criterion for granting a waiver varies greatly and tends to be specific to the device. Some general factors used to consider granting or denying waiver requests are:
|
| ExpressCard Mandate: Informational Effective Date: The USB-IF does not offer certification for the USB interface of ExpressCard. The USB connection on ExpressCard is considered internal and the responsibility of the vendor/integrator.
|
| USB-IF Certified USB Logo Trademark Violations Mandate: Informational Effective Date: n/a The USB-IF has an active program to address improper use of its trademarks and will audit devices that display the Certified USB Logo. If a commercially available product is suspected of violating USB-IF compliance requirements, contact the USB-IF. Please provide specific examples of the alleged non-complying merchandise including:
We will evaluate whether appropriate action should be taken. Send all appropriate information to Admin@usb.org. Please note that the USB-IF will keep your information confidential. |
| Qualification by Similarity Policy Statement Mandate: Required Effective Date: August, 2008 Qualification by Similarity The USB-IF offers a Qualification by Similarity program to member companies. The QbS program allows a USB product that is substantially similar to a fully tested and certified USB product to be granted certification based on its similarity to the originally certified product. The purpose of the QbS program is to speed time-to-market and to minimize certification costs. It is not intended to eliminate the requirement that a product actually passes USB-IF compliance tests. Policy The only authority to grant Qualification by Similarity to a product is the USB-IF compliance committee and the certification review board. No test facility or any other entity is authorized to grant or pursue Qualification by Similarity requests on behalf of the USB-IF. The new product must be similar to a USB certified product that has undergone full and complete compliance testing. The new product cannot be compared to another product that itself has been granted Qualification by Similarity. If the original certified product on which the Qualification by Similarity is based is older than 3 years, then a complete and full retest is required of the new product. Procedure
|
| Site sponsored by USB Implementers Forum, Inc., creators of USB technology. | VTM Association Management |
| About Us | Privacy Statement |